The Detention of Innocents at Gitmo

A look at fear mongering and keeping Gitmo open

© Christopher Earle

May 21, 2009
A Question of Justice, Photo: svilen mushkatov, stock.xchng
A recent article in the New York Times cited the statistic that 1 in 7 people released from Guantanamo Bay returned to terrorism. The article didn't look at the other 6.

A May 20th article in the New York Times reports that 74 of the 534 prisoners already released from the American detention center at Guantanamo Bay are currently involved in terrorism or militant activity. The report cites a Pentagon report a recidivism rate of 14%.

Most Detainees Returned to Normal Lives in Spite of Human Rights Abuses

Completely missing from the article and the report is information on the 460 people who are not engaging in militancy or terrorist activities. Those people make up 86 percent of people detained for varying periods of time and subsequently released with no charges filed.

The mass detention, often for years, without charge of people who appear, as a resounding majority, factually innocent raises the question of whether the 14% who have gone "back" to terrorism did, in fact, go "back" to terrorism or whether their experiences at the hands of people now proven to have engaged in torture created or reinforced a hatred of the west that resulted in the creation of new militants and terrorists.

If U.S. Personnel Were Declared Unlawful Combatants

The stark reality that 6 of 7 people held at Guantanamo Bay simply went back to their lives, often as broken men as a result of harsh interrogation techniques, seems to have escaped not only the New York Times, but also the U.S. Congress. As a comparison, if the roles were reversed and the U.S. military personnel in Iraq, some 156,000, were declared "unlawful combatants," the Iraqis would be "justified" in holding 1.09 million Americans indefinitely and without charges.

Effects on American International Reputation

By kidnapping, torturing, and killing, through collateral damage, people innocent of crimes, the United States creates far more enemies than would be otherwise created. The attitude appears to many people outside of the U.S. to be paternalistic and imperialistic.

According to a 2004 article by Sergio Fabbrini, the unilateralism of the 2003 invasion of Iraq increased anti-Americanism in Europe. A Pew Research Center report from June 2006 showed more than 70% of Middle Easterners viewing Americans as selfish, violent, and greedy. Attitudes that support the indefinite jailing with no charge of 7 people in the interest of catching one have been at the root of Latin American anti-Americanism for decades.

Justice Delayed is Still Justice

If the United States wants to fight terrorism, it must stop using illegal and immoral techniques against large populations of people in the interest of capturing the occasional person involved in anti-American insurgency. By detaining, torturing, and killing innocents, the U.S. becomes part of an international feedback loop that increases anti-American sentiments.


The copyright of the article The Detention of Innocents at Gitmo in International Affairs is owned by Christopher Earle. Permission to republish The Detention of Innocents at Gitmo in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.


A Question of Justice, Photo: svilen mushkatov, stock.xchng
       


Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo

Comments
May 31, 2009 9:13 AM
Guest :
Hell yea!
Guantanamo bay is poposterous, it is compleat common sence that the countries these detanees came from are furious. Your holding their innocent people and humiliating them and torturing them! This is problably the cause of terrorism to america.............. and we wonder why?
1 Comment: